“You will eat” or “you will eat”: how to speak and write correctly
Many words and expressions that seem familiar and well-established to us still haunt linguists. For example, “you will eat” or “you will eat” - Are both options correct, in what situations are they relevant? Answers to these questions are offered in the article.
“You will eat” or “you will eat”: what is the difference
Indeed, is there a difference between these phrases? Both options mean a proposal to eat, eat. Therefore, they have the same meaning.
“You will eat” or “you will eat” - these phrases may seem interchangeable. Is it any wonder that sometimes they are confused even by people who correctly understand the stylistic and emotional coloring of each version? This can hardly be called illiteracy or a serious speech mistake, but the existence of a difference should be remembered.
Eat or eat
"Is" - a verb that implies the usual process of eating. The phrase "you will be" is devoid of emotional coloring. She is equally popular in literary and colloquial speech. For example, you can often hear the sentence “go eat, everything is ready.”
“To eat” is a verb that has an emotional coloring. He is able to express the tenderness that a person has for someone. More often it is used in relation to small children, sick people. Say, a mother can say to her son: “Eat some gruel until it is cold.”
Men and women
“You will eat” or “you will eat” - does the choice of a phrase depend on the person’s gender? Often, such a proposal is addressed to a woman. Suppose a man can ask his companion in a restaurant: “What are you going to eat?”. Also the woman herself can report that she "has already eaten".
In relation to men, it is preferable to choose the verb "is". The second option in this case will sound like a flattery or ridicule. Also, the representative of the stronger sex should not use the verb "to eat" in the first person, as it sounds sugary and mannered, makes you lose faith in the speaker's masculinity.
So, "let's go eat" or "let's go eat"? Often, the first option is preferred by people who want to be polite, afraid to offend the interlocutor. It seems to them that the word “is” sounds excessively rough, straightforward. In other words, they are trying to veil him.
In practice, the effect is often the opposite. For example, an appeal to a healthy adult “eat, Nikolai Vasilievich” may seem to be a hoax. Also, the interlocutor may see in an innocent phrase a mockery that will make him offended. The establishment of trust and warm relations is not at all conducive.
Fathers and Sons
Do children eat or eat? Obviously, if we are talking about a child, the second option is not only not forbidden, but even encouraged. His warm and patronizing emotional coloring in this case is most welcome. Also, children can safely use the verb "eat" in the first person, it sounds nice and does not cause irritation.
Also with the help of this verb, you can emphasize the protective attitude towards an adult. For example, mothers and fathers can use it, inviting their matured sons and daughters to the table.In this case, the preference for the option “to eat” is justified stylistically and emotionally. However, there is still no certainty that this will not jar the interlocutor.
A look into the past
So, will you eat or will you eat? The story will help to understand this. How did it happen that “duplicates” appeared in the Russian language, which have the same semantic meaning?
The fact is that initially a slightly different meaning was put into the word “eat”. This verb was used when it meant “eat a little”, “try”. Then he was taken into service by servants who offered their masters “to eat”. Interestingly, this verb was used not only in relation to food, but also to drinks. Suffice it to recall the steady expression "eat vodka."
Food or food
"Eat" or "eat" - how to? Choosing between these two verbs, it is necessary to take into account the contents of the plate. Is there a difference between food and food? At first glance it seems that the answer to this question will be negative. No wonder, both words mean food.
In reality, the difference is still there, let it be noticed by no means always.Under the dish means delicacy, which in a special occasion served dear guests. Whereas a plate of pasta with a cutlet is food.
Nowadays, the difference is not easy to notice, since the word “delicacy” is firmly established in our language. Food that fits this definition, many people use almost daily. Otherwise, the situation was still about a hundred years ago, when it was not food, but dishes that were served on the table.
Naturally or roughly
“Is” - can this word be called overly coarse, mundane? It is hardly possible if we recall other verbs in one way or another connected with eating. For example, swallow, chew, eat.
Obviously, the word "is" in such an environment gives the impression of neutral. You can use it safely, without fear of offending the interlocutor.
"Eat" or "eat" - how to? When it comes to writing, both options are also valid. The first of the verbs is often found in fiction. It is not surprising, because with its help it is easier for the author to emphasize the intonation that will sound in the reader’s head. Care, anxiety, love - about what this word will not tell. Also with its help it is easy to create the image of a kind, courteous hero.
The verb "to eat" is actively used in informal correspondence. For example, a woman may ask her friend if she eats well. Of course, a letter in which this word appears is not worth sending to a business partner or boss.
Instead of output
From time to time, people use both options. Sometimes they are mistaken with the choice of the right word, sometimes they hit the spot, which allows them to make emotional contact with their interlocutor. In any case, the need to choose can be called another proof of the wealth of the Russian language.